Method

How each benchmark is researched

Every case study on this site follows the same sequence: pick sources by who issued them, search with operators that reach the record, verify each claim against a locator, then export the whole chain so anyone can re-check it.

Step one

Sources: ranked by who issued them

Source quality is decided by provenance, not by search rank. Each source in a case study is tagged with its tier and its issuer.

Tier 1 — issuing body

The organisation that created or holds the record: a national archive, statistics office, court, parliament, ministry, space agency or central bank. A claim is only marked Verified when a tier 1 document supports it.

A judgment read on the court's own reporting site rather than a summary of it.

Tier 2 — institutional secondary

Museums, universities, national libraries and official history programmes that describe a record they hold or curate. Used for context and for locating tier 1 material.

A museum collection page describing an object, used to find the accession record.

Tier 3 — encyclopedic and press

Reference works and reporting. Used only to build a search path or to flag a disagreement, never as the sole support for a published answer. Where a page still leans on tier 3, the case study says so in its limitations.

A reference article that gives an approximate date, prompting a check against the register.

The starting points are listed on the official source directory.

Step two

Search operators used

Searches are recorded verbatim in each case study, including the ones that failed. These are the operators that do most of the work.
OperatorWhat it is forExample
site:Restrict a search to one institution's domain so results cannot drift to aggregators.site:gov.gh district assembly establishment instrument
"exact phrase"Pin wording that would appear in the record itself rather than in a retelling."Legislative Instrument" "District Assembly" 2018
filetype:Reach the primary document — gazette, statute, report — instead of a page describing it.filetype:pdf annual report reserve bank opening 1914
-excludedStrip a dominant but wrong result that swamps the first page.voyager launch date -"voyager 1"
intitle: / inurl:Find index and register pages that list records rather than discuss them.intitle:index district assemblies list
Date-limited searchSeparate contemporaneous reporting from later commentary when a date is contested.Results restricted to the month of the event.

Step three

Verification rules

A claim is not published because it is plausible. These are the conditions it has to meet first.

Two independent supports for the answer

The published answer must be supported by at least two sources that do not derive from each other. If only one exists, the page says so and the status stays partial.

A locator for every claim

Each claim records where in the document it was found — page, clause, section, table or paragraph — so a reader can re-open the same place.

Access date recorded

Every source carries the date it was opened. Live pages change; the record states when the wording was read.

Disagreements are published, not smoothed

Where sources conflict on a date or a name, both readings appear with their sources, and the reason for preferring one is stated.

Search shortcuts disclosed

If a plain search exposed the answer directly, that search is logged and flagged. A benchmark that a snippet answers is a weak benchmark, and the log shows which ones were rewritten because of it.

Nothing is inferred into existence

No quotation, page number, figure or source is written unless it was opened. Gaps stay visible as gaps.

Step four

The evidence-chain audit export

Every completed case study has a download that maps each claim to the source behind it and the verification status of that source.

What the report contains

  • Reference, title, domain, answer and the date last verified.
  • Each claim, with the source it rests on, the locator and its status.
  • Each source, with issuer, URL, access date, classification and reliability.
  • Any search that exposed the answer, listed as a disclosed shortcut.
  • Claims that no source supports — printed as gaps rather than hidden.

Where to get it

Open any case study and use the audit download in its header. The Ghana local authority page additionally exports its full search log as CSV or JSON, with the filters applied at the time of export recorded inside the file.

Honesty

What this method does not do

The method is designed to be checkable, not to sound authoritative.
  • It does not turn a single source into a fact. Where only one source exists, the page says so.
  • It does not claim archival access that was not used. Where a record was read through an online portal rather than a physical file, that is stated.
  • It does not claim to describe how any AI system works internally. Where an assistant is tested, only its visible responses on stated dates are reported.
  • It does not present demonstrations as client work. Independent studies are labelled as such on the page itself.