Independent Demonstration Project — Not Client Work

Web research • AI evaluation • Benchmark design

Computing History Benchmark

A computing-history question with a documented decoy month and a time-zone trap.

The network in question is usually dated to the month its first hardware was installed, which is not when anything was transmitted. The transmission itself is logged with a local timestamp late at night, so the answer shifts by a day if the log is read in UTC. Both traps are recorded rather than hidden.

View Research Challenge Read the research note
PDFGOVARCHDBEVIDENCE CHAINVERIFIED ANSWER
Role
Researcher and Benchmark Designer
Project type
Independent Demonstration
Status
Complete and verified
Domain
Technology history

Project Overview

Frontier AI browsing systems can answer many questions by locating obvious keywords or matching information from highly ranked webpages. This project explores how to construct a research question that cannot be solved through a single search. The answer must remain short, stable and objectively verifiable, while the clues require the researcher to connect different people, dates, places, organisations, publications, events, records and quantities.

Research Goal

Design one difficult but fair browsing challenge.

Required Answer

A short, stable and objectively verifiable fact.

Evidence Standard

Every clue must be independently supported by reliable evidence.

Final Deliverable

A question, answer, clue set, source trail, validation log and JSON record.

AIBRC-006

The Research Challenge

Challenge ID
AIBRC-006
Research domain
Computing and Network History
Difficulty level
Advanced
Date created
4 September 2026
Last verified
4 September 2026
Expected answer type
Short text
Research question
In 1969 a student programmer in Los Angeles transmitted the first characters to a host at a research institute several hundred miles north, at 10:30 pm local time. On what date, in local Pacific time, did that transmission take place?
Correct answer
29 October 1969
Answer-normalisation rules
Case-insensitive; punctuation ignored. Accepted variations: 29 October 1969; October 29, 1969; 29/10/1969; 1969-10-29.
Confidence level
High — logged timestamp corroborated by an institutional timeline
Challenge status
Complete and verified

Portfolio integrity note: Every claim on this page was checked against the cited source before publication. No source, quotation, locator or search result is invented; where a detail could not be verified directly it is described rather than quoted.

Research Method

  1. Step 1Establish the Answer

    Begin with a stable fact that can be confirmed through a reliable primary or authoritative source. Record the exact wording, document title, issuing organisation and publication date.

  2. Step 2Build Independent Clues

    Develop clues involving different fact types, including dates, people, places, organisations, works, events, records and quantities. Each clue must be independently checkable.

  3. Step 3Test Discoverability

    Run obvious, broad and targeted search queries. Record the results to identify accidental shortcuts, direct answer leakage and misleading pages.

  4. Step 4Construct the Evidence Chain

    Explain how each source supports a specific clue and how the clues logically combine to identify one answer.

  5. Step 5Validate and Package

    Recheck every source, confirm answer uniqueness, document limitations and export the completed benchmark record in a consistent JSON format.

Clue Matrix

Each clue constrains the answer from a different direction. No single row is sufficient on its own, and every row can be checked against a source another researcher can reach.

Verified clue set

Statuses are editable so the matrix can be worked through row by row. Scroll sideways on small screens.

Clue matrix listing clue identifier, fact type, statement, constraint, supporting source, exact locator and verification status.
Clue IDFact typeClue statementConstraintSupporting sourceExact locatorVerification status
C01DateThe first interface message processor was installed at a Los Angeles university in September 1969.Fixes the network and the year while excluding the answer month.Internet Society — Brief History of the InternetParagraph beginning “All this came together in September 1969…”
Verified
C02OrganisationBy the end of that year four host computers were connected into the initial network.Confirms the network without naming the first transmission.Internet Society — Brief History of the InternetSame section
Verified
C03PersonThe transmission was made between a student programmer at the Los Angeles site and a programmer at a research institute further north.Two named individuals: Charley Kline and Bill Duvall.Wikipedia — ARPANETSection on the first message
Verified
C04TimeThe transmission is logged at 10:30 pm local Pacific time.Distinguishes the local date from the UTC date, which falls on the following day.Wikipedia — ARPANETIMP log caption
Verified
C05EventThe network was switched on in late October 1969.Independent corroboration of the month from a museum timeline.Computer History Museum — Timeline of Computer History, 19691969 networking entry
Verified

Evidence Records

Each card records a source that was opened and read before it was cited. Excerpts are quoted only where the wording was read directly; otherwise the record describes what the source shows.

E01
Verified
Claim supported
The answer, and clues C03 and C04.
Source title
ARPANET
Author / issuing institution
Wikipedia
Source type
Reference database
Publication date
Continuously edited article
Page number
n/a (web page)
Table, figure or section
First message and IMP log caption
Relevant excerpt
“…the first message ever sent via the ARPANET, 10:30 pm PST on 29 October 1969 (6:30 UTC on 30 October 1969)” and “…between Stanford Research Institute (SRI) and UCLA, by SRI programmer Bill Duvall and UCLA student programmer Charley Kline…”
Researcher's interpretation
Gives both the local and UTC timestamps, which is exactly the ambiguity the benchmark tests.
Access date
4 September 2026
Archive URL
[Not archived yet]
Classification
Secondary
Reliability assessment
Medium-high — sourced encyclopaedia entry, corroborated below
E02
Verified
Claim supported
Clues C01 and C02 — the September installation and the four-host network.
Source title
Brief History of the Internet
Author / issuing institution
Internet Society
Source type
Technical organisation
Publication date
Standing history page
Page number
n/a (web page)
Table, figure or section
Initial Internetting Concepts / 1969
Relevant excerpt
“All this came together in September 1969 when BBN installed the first IMP at UCLA and the first host computer was connected… by the end of 1969, four host computers were connected together into the initial ARPANET.”
Researcher's interpretation
Written by people directly involved in the work; it dates the installation but not the first message, which keeps the decoy month in play.
Access date
4 September 2026
Archive URL
[Not archived yet]
Classification
Primary
Reliability assessment
High
E03
Verified
Claim supported
Clue C05 — independent corroboration of the month.
Source title
Timeline of Computer History — 1969
Author / issuing institution
Computer History Museum
Source type
Museum record
Publication date
Standing timeline
Page number
n/a (web page)
Table, figure or section
Networking, 1969
Relevant excerpt
“Switched on in late October 1969, the ARPAnet is the first large-scale, general-purpose computer network to connect different kinds of computers together.”
Researcher's interpretation
A curated institutional record that narrows the month without giving the day, so it corroborates without leaking the answer.
Access date
4 September 2026
Archive URL
[Not archived yet]
Classification
Secondary
Reliability assessment
High — curated museum source

Search Validation Record

A strong benchmark documents the searches a capable researcher or browsing agent would naturally attempt, including the ones that exposed the answer. Leakage is recorded rather than hidden, and the question is rewritten around it.

Direct wording searchKeyword combinationExact-phrase searchPerson and date searchOrganisation and location searchDomain-restricted searchPDF-only searchGovernment-site searchInstitutional-database searchAlternative spelling search
4 searches run and recorded
Search validation record.
Search numberExact search querySearch engine or databaseDate searchedTop relevant resultsAnswer revealed?Problem discoveredAction taken
S01when was ARPANET createdGoogle4 September 2026Returns 1969 and the September installation, not the transmission date.NoNone — it lands on the decoy month.Kept as evidence that the obvious query misses.
S02first message sent over ARPANET dateGoogle4 September 2026Exposes 29 October 1969 in the snippet.YesDirect wording search solves the task immediately.The question was rewritten to avoid 'ARPANET' and 'first message', describing the two sites and the log timestamp instead.
S03UCLA Stanford Research Institute host to host transmission 1969 programmer logGoogle4 September 2026Returns anniversary coverage and archival material; the day is confirmed only after opening a record.NoNone — this is the intended path.Retained as the reference path.
S04ARPANET first message 30 October 1969 UTCGoogle4 September 2026Surfaces the alternative UTC date used by some accounts.YesTwo defensible dates exist depending on the time zone.The question fixes local Pacific time, and 30 October 1969 is documented here as the near-miss rather than accepted.

Source Quality Assessment

Every candidate source is scored from 1 to 5 against five criteria before it is allowed into the evidence chain.

  • 1Authority

    3 / 5

    Who created or issued the information?

  • 2Proximity

    3 / 5

    Is the source directly connected to the event or record?

  • 3Specificity

    3 / 5

    Does it support the precise claim being made?

  • 4Stability

    3 / 5

    Is the information unlikely to change?

  • 5Traceability

    3 / 5

    Can another researcher locate the same evidence?

Evidence-Chain Audit

Export a report that maps every clue to the source it rests on, records the verification status and access date of each source, and lists the searches that exposed the answer.

Claims audited
5
Sources in the chain
3
Disclosed shortcuts
2

Benchmark Quality Checks

Completion

14 of 15 checks confirmed

93%

Structured Benchmark Record

The complete challenge is delivered as a single validated JSON document.

aibrc-006-benchmark-record.json

{
  "challenge_id": "AIBRC-006",
  "title": "Computing History Benchmark",
  "project_type": "independent_demonstration",
  "research_domain": "Computing and Network History",
  "difficulty": "advanced",
  "question": "In 1969 a student programmer in Los Angeles transmitted the first characters to a host at a research institute several hundred miles north, at 10:30 pm local time. On what date, in local Pacific time, did that transmission take place?",
  "accepted_answers": [
    "29 October 1969"
  ],
  "answer_type": "short_text",
  "answer_normalisation": {
    "case_sensitive": false,
    "ignore_punctuation": true,
    "accepted_variations": [
      "29 October 1969",
      "October 29, 1969",
      "29/10/1969",
      "1969-10-29"
    ]
  },
  "clues": [
    {
      "clue_id": "C01",
      "fact_type": "date",
      "statement": "The first interface message processor was installed at a Los Angeles university in September 1969.",
      "constraint": "Fixes the network and the year while excluding the answer month.",
      "source": "Internet Society — Brief History of the Internet",
      "locator": "Paragraph beginning “All this came together in September 1969…”",
      "status": "verified"
    },
    {
      "clue_id": "C02",
      "fact_type": "organisation",
      "statement": "By the end of that year four host computers were connected into the initial network.",
      "constraint": "Confirms the network without naming the first transmission.",
      "source": "Internet Society — Brief History of the Internet",
      "locator": "Same section",
      "status": "verified"
    },
    {
      "clue_id": "C03",
      "fact_type": "person",
      "statement": "The transmission was made between a student programmer at the Los Angeles site and a programmer at a research institute further north.",
      "constraint": "Two named individuals: Charley Kline and Bill Duvall.",
      "source": "Wikipedia — ARPANET",
      "locator": "Section on the first message",
      "status": "verified"
    },
    {
      "clue_id": "C04",
      "fact_type": "time",
      "statement": "The transmission is logged at 10:30 pm local Pacific time.",
      "constraint": "Distinguishes the local date from the UTC date, which falls on the following day.",
      "source": "Wikipedia — ARPANET",
      "locator": "IMP log caption",
      "status": "verified"
    },
    {
      "clue_id": "C05",
      "fact_type": "event",
      "statement": "The network was switched on in late October 1969.",
      "constraint": "Independent corroboration of the month from a museum timeline.",
      "source": "Computer History Museum — Timeline of Computer History, 1969",
      "locator": "1969 networking entry",
      "status": "verified"
    }
  ],
  "evidence": [
    {
      "evidence_id": "E01",
      "claim_supported": "The answer, and clues C03 and C04.",
      "source_title": "ARPANET",
      "issuing_organisation": "Wikipedia",
      "source_type": "Reference database",
      "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET",
      "publication_date": "Continuously edited article",
      "page_number": "n/a (web page)",
      "section": "First message and IMP log caption",
      "access_date": "4 September 2026",
      "reliability": "Medium-high — sourced encyclopaedia entry, corroborated below",
      "verification_status": "verified"
    },
    {
      "evidence_id": "E02",
      "claim_supported": "Clues C01 and C02 — the September installation and the four-host network.",
      "source_title": "Brief History of the Internet",
      "issuing_organisation": "Internet Society",
      "source_type": "Technical organisation",
      "url": "https://www.internetsociety.org/internet/history-internet/brief-history-internet/",
      "publication_date": "Standing history page",
      "page_number": "n/a (web page)",
      "section": "Initial Internetting Concepts / 1969",
      "access_date": "4 September 2026",
      "reliability": "High",
      "verification_status": "verified"
    },
    {
      "evidence_id": "E03",
      "claim_supported": "Clue C05 — independent corroboration of the month.",
      "source_title": "Timeline of Computer History — 1969",
      "issuing_organisation": "Computer History Museum",
      "source_type": "Museum record",
      "url": "https://www.computerhistory.org/timeline/1969/",
      "publication_date": "Standing timeline",
      "page_number": "n/a (web page)",
      "section": "Networking, 1969",
      "access_date": "4 September 2026",
      "reliability": "High — curated museum source",
      "verification_status": "verified"
    }
  ],
  "search_validation": [
    {
      "search_id": "S01",
      "query": "when was ARPANET created",
      "platform": "Google",
      "search_date": "4 September 2026",
      "relevant_results": "Returns 1969 and the September installation, not the transmission date.",
      "answer_exposed": false,
      "notes": "None — it lands on the decoy month. Kept as evidence that the obvious query misses."
    },
    {
      "search_id": "S02",
      "query": "first message sent over ARPANET date",
      "platform": "Google",
      "search_date": "4 September 2026",
      "relevant_results": "Exposes 29 October 1969 in the snippet.",
      "answer_exposed": true,
      "notes": "Direct wording search solves the task immediately. The question was rewritten to avoid 'ARPANET' and 'first message', describing the two sites and the log timestamp instead."
    },
    {
      "search_id": "S03",
      "query": "UCLA Stanford Research Institute host to host transmission 1969 programmer log",
      "platform": "Google",
      "search_date": "4 September 2026",
      "relevant_results": "Returns anniversary coverage and archival material; the day is confirmed only after opening a record.",
      "answer_exposed": false,
      "notes": "None — this is the intended path. Retained as the reference path."
    },
    {
      "search_id": "S04",
      "query": "ARPANET first message 30 October 1969 UTC",
      "platform": "Google",
      "search_date": "4 September 2026",
      "relevant_results": "Surfaces the alternative UTC date used by some accounts.",
      "answer_exposed": true,
      "notes": "Two defensible dates exist depending on the time zone. The question fixes local Pacific time, and 30 October 1969 is documented here as the near-miss rather than accepted."
    }
  ],
  "quality_checks": {
    "The answer is short and objectively verifiable.": true,
    "The answer is supported by an authoritative source.": true,
    "The question has only one defensible answer.": true,
    "No single clue directly exposes the answer.": true,
    "Each clue is independently checkable.": true,
    "The clue set spans multiple fact types.": true,
    "The task requires multi-step reasoning.": true,
    "Obvious searches have been documented.": true,
    "Search-result snippets do not reveal the answer.": false,
    "Sources are publicly accessible.": true,
    "Exact pages, tables or sections are recorded.": true,
    "The evidence chain can be reproduced.": true,
    "The question avoids subjective interpretation.": true,
    "The answer is stable over time.": true,
    "No fabricated evidence is included.": true
  },
  "researcher": {
    "name": "TMK Research Lab",
    "portfolio": "https://theophilusmorkporkpor.lovable.app",
    "email": "tkudjordjie@gmail.com"
  }
}

Skills Demonstrated

  • Open-Web Research
  • Investigative Research
  • Fact-Checking
  • Source Verification
  • Primary-Source Research
  • Institutional Databases
  • Government Records
  • Archive Research
  • PDF Investigation
  • Search Strategy
  • Evidence Documentation
  • Research Problem Design
  • Benchmark Construction
  • AI Evaluation
  • Adversarial Testing
  • Data Validation
  • JSON
  • Structured Data
  • Technical Writing
  • Quality Assurance

Research Tools

  • Google Search and advanced search operators
  • Google Scholar
  • Google Books
  • Google Maps
  • Government websites
  • Institutional databases
  • Digital archives
  • Public registries
  • PDF search
  • Internet Archive
  • Spreadsheets
  • Microsoft Word
  • Google Docs
  • JSON validators
  • Browser developer tools
  • AI systems used for testing, not as final evidence

AI-generated statements are never treated as evidence. Every factual claim must be verified against an accessible external source.

Project Outcome

This benchmark is complete: the answer is fixed, 3 evidence records are attached to specific clues, and 4 validation searches are documented, including those that exposed the answer. It demonstrates the ability to approach an unfamiliar subject systematically, separate evidence from assumption and document research so that another person can audit it.

Reflection and Limitations

What made the question difficult

Three dates are in circulation: the September hardware installation, the 29 October local transmission and the 30 October UTC equivalent.

Which searches failed

Queries about when the network was 'created' returned the September installation and never reached the transmission log.

Which source proved decisive

The log caption that carries both the Pacific and UTC timestamps, because it makes the discrepancy explicit instead of leaving it to be inferred.

How ambiguity was removed

The question names the time zone, so only one of the two defensible dates survives.

What an AI browsing agent might get wrong

Answering September 1969, or returning 30 October 1969 by quoting the UTC conversion without noticing the question specifies local time.

Remaining limitations

The decisive detail here rests partly on an encyclopaedia article; a scan of the original IMP log page would make the chain fully primary.

Recommended future improvements

Locate the digitised UCLA log sheet and cite the handwritten entry directly.

Need a careful researcher for complex web investigations?

I am available for web research, fact-checking, AI evaluation, benchmark construction, source verification and structured research documentation.

TMK Research Labtkudjordjie@gmail.comhttps://theophilusmorkporkpor.lovable.apphttps://www.linkedin.com/in/theophilus-kudzordzi